The Queens Diamond Jubilee |
As humans we have evolved as social animals. In
an evolutionary sense, being in a group offered protection and the sharing
of resources such as food to our ancestors - making the idea of a group
appealing to an individual. On a social level, groups
offer emotional support and a sense of belonging. Furthermore,
research shows that happiness spreads through social networks - making the
jubilee an opportunity for happiness and positivity to
spread through the nation. This happiness can spread through even
three degrees of separation - so for example, if a friend of a friend is happy,
your chances of happiness increases by around 6%. Although sadness spreads
in the exact same way, this spreads slightly less compared with the spread of
happiness. So national pride this weekend may be making many of us feel
slightly more chipper.
When will we unite as human? |
So, being in a group is better for our survival and
spreads our happiness - but why do groups have leadership? Why have we evolved
from cave men to a current society ruled by the Queen? The evolutionary
leadership theory shows how leadership was important for the survival and
reproduction of our ancestors. Leadership is a behavioural strategy which has
evolved to solve social coordination problems from ancestral times -
such as moving areas, and conflicting with other groups. Furthermore, research
shows groups with leaders do better than those without leaders, as the leader
improves group performance and effectiveness. If leadership helps the
individual then it’s wise to follow.
This guy's having none of it... |
Interestingly, a study found that community spirit can
backfire. Feelings of social power and connections may lead us to dehumanise
people outside our own community. This relates to something called the
fundamental attribution error (FAE). Now as scary as this sounds, in simple
terms, this is the idea that you favour people and sympathise with them more
when they identify with you socially. The FAE occurs when
we overestimate how much someone's behaviour
is explained by their personality, and underestimate the
importance of situational factors. An example is if you were to trip over an
uneven pavement, you would know that the pavement tripped you. But if someone
else were to trip you may consider them clumsy, putting it down to their
personality not the situational factor of a pavement slab sticking out. You are
more likely to see someone as clumsy if they do not relate to you socially. This
explains why people from different social backgrounds can be judged with
inaccurate character traits.
What a happy bunch coming together this weekend to celebrate the Queen's Diamond Jubilee. |
- it's two days off work.
Now, this week I decided to go a bit out of my usual
scientific box and branch into the world of psychology and human behaviour.
This isn't my speciality and although I have read around the subject, I'm no
expert on this. If you have any comments, share them on
facebook.com/humaninterests.
References
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20827882.300-how-community-spirit-can-backfire.html
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16194-happiness-spreads-like-the-plague.html
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328472.800-the-happiness-equation--the-making-of-a-satisfied-scientist.html
http://www.buzzle.com/articles/fundamental-attribution-error-examples.html
No comments:
Post a Comment